|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
28/05/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
ALBICETTE, M.M.; BRASESCO, R.; HEGEDÜS, P. DE |
Afiliación : |
MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INSTITUTO PLAN AGROPECUARIO; BRASESCO, ROSINA, UNIDAD EXPERIMENTAL DEMOSTRATIVA DE YOUNG (CONVENIO SRRN-INIA); PEDRO DE HEGEDÜS, FACULTAD DE AGRONOMÍA (DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES). |
Título : |
Evaluación de impacto de un proyecto de difusión y transferencia de tecnología (PDTT). |
Fecha de publicación : |
1999 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Young, (Uruguay): Sociedad Rural de Río Negro; Instituto Plan Agropecuario, 1999. |
Páginas : |
83 p. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
"Informe Final de la Evaluación del Proyecto de Difusión y Transferencia de Tecnología (PDTT): ""Fortalecimiento de la Unidad Experimental y Demostrativa de Young (UEDY)"". El objetivo es tener un conocimiento del impacto del Proyecto en el medio." |
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA; ANALISIS DE DATOS; DIFUSION DE INFORMACION; DIFUSION DE LA INVESTIGACION; DISEÑO DE PROYECTOS; DSI; ENCUESTAS; ENTREVISTAS; EVALUACION; EVALUACION DE PROYECTOS; EXTENSION; GESTION; INVESTIGACION; PROYECTOS DE DESARROLLO; TECNOLOGIA DE COMUNICACION; TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4951/1/EN-4279-Evaluacion-de-impacto-de-un-Proyecto-de-Difusion.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01265nam a2200349 a 4500 001 1058548 005 2018-05-28 008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M. 245 $aEvaluación de impacto de un proyecto de difusión y transferencia de tecnología (PDTT). 260 $aYoung, (Uruguay): Sociedad Rural de Río Negro; Instituto Plan Agropecuario$c1999 300 $a83 p. 500 $a"Informe Final de la Evaluación del Proyecto de Difusión y Transferencia de Tecnología (PDTT): ""Fortalecimiento de la Unidad Experimental y Demostrativa de Young (UEDY)"". El objetivo es tener un conocimiento del impacto del Proyecto en el medio." 650 $aAGRICULTURA 650 $aANALISIS DE DATOS 650 $aDIFUSION DE INFORMACION 650 $aDIFUSION DE LA INVESTIGACION 650 $aDISEÑO DE PROYECTOS 650 $aDSI 650 $aENCUESTAS 650 $aENTREVISTAS 650 $aEVALUACION 650 $aEVALUACION DE PROYECTOS 650 $aEXTENSION 650 $aGESTION 650 $aINVESTIGACION 650 $aPROYECTOS DE DESARROLLO 650 $aTECNOLOGIA DE COMUNICACION 650 $aTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA 650 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aBRASESCO, R. 700 1 $aHEGEDÜS, P. DE
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
25/02/2021 |
Actualizado : |
25/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
ABREU, E. S.; DINI, M.; CARRA, B.; MARCHI, P. M.; HERTER, F. G.; MELLO-FARIAS, P. C. |
Afiliación : |
E. S. ABREU, Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil; MAXIMILIANO ANTONIO DINI VIÑOLY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil; BRUNO CARRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil; P. M. MARCHI, Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil; F. G. HERTER, Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil; P.C. MELLO-FARIAS, Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Agronomia (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas-RS, Brazil. |
Título : |
Bud break promoters following different chilling hour accumulation of 'Hosui' pear. [Conference paper]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 299-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.42 |
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.42 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Pear is a temperate crop, which grows in mild winter regions, and may present several development anomalies, which can negatively affect yield and fruit quality. To overcome these obstacles and achieve economically satisfactory yields, the use of bud break promoters has shown promising results. The most used promoters are hydrogen cyanamide (HC), mineral oil (MO) and Erger®. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HC, MO and Erger® following different chilling hour accumulation on bud break of 'Hosui' pear. 'Hosui' pear shoots were collected with 103 chill hours (CH) and conditioned in cold storage at 4±1°C for 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 days. For each date, shoots were cut as single bud cuttings, where the following treatments were applied in four replications of ten cuttings: control (water), HC 1%, MO 5%, Erger® 3% + calcium nitrate 3%, and HC 0.5% + OM 3%. After these, they were forced in a growth chamber until bud break, which was assessed every two days to estimate the bud break percentage and average bud break time. Bud break percentage showed no difference between treatments when submitted to 0 and 6 days (247 CH) of cold storage. After 12 days (391 CH), HC and HC + MO increase bud break percentage compared to the control. Those exposed to 18 days (535 CH) and treated with HC and HC + MO showed no significant difference in the bud break percentage compared to the control, whereas Erger® and MO significantly decreased the bud break percentage compared to other treatments. The average bud break time of HC treated cuttings was advanced the most and control delayed the most. When cuttings were subjected to low chilling hour accumulation, HC and HC + MO were more effective in bud break compared to Erger® and the control, while with higher chilling hour accumulation, the bud break promoters were dispensable.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosABSTRACT.
Pear is a temperate crop, which grows in mild winter regions, and may present several development anomalies, which can negatively affect yield and fruit quality. To overcome these obstacles and achieve economically satisfactory yields, the use of bud break promoters has shown promising results. The most used promoters are hydrogen cyanamide (HC), mineral oil (MO) and Erger®. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HC, MO and Erger® following different chilling hour accumulation on bud break of 'Hosui' pear. 'Hosui' pear shoots were collected with 103 chill hours (CH) and conditioned in cold storage at 4±1°C for 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 days. For each date, shoots were cut as single bud cuttings, where the following treatments were applied in four replications of ten cuttings: control (water), HC 1%, MO 5%, Erger® 3% + calcium nitrate 3%, and HC 0.5% + OM 3%. After these, they were forced in a growth chamber until bud break, which was assessed every two days to estimate the bud break percentage and average bud break time. Bud break percentage showed no difference between treatments when submitted to 0 and 6 days (247 CH) of cold storage. After 12 days (391 CH), HC and HC + MO increase bud break percentage compared to the control. Those exposed to 18 days (535 CH) and treated with HC and HC + MO showed no significant difference in the bud break percentage compared to the control, whereas Erger® and MO significantly decreased the bud break percentage c... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Dormancy; Erger®; Hydrogen cyanamide; Mild winter conditions; Mineral oil; Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 03083naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1061762 005 2021-03-25 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) 024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.42$2DOI 100 1 $aABREU, E. S. 245 $aBud break promoters following different chilling hour accumulation of 'Hosui' pear. [Conference paper].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. 520 $aABSTRACT. Pear is a temperate crop, which grows in mild winter regions, and may present several development anomalies, which can negatively affect yield and fruit quality. To overcome these obstacles and achieve economically satisfactory yields, the use of bud break promoters has shown promising results. The most used promoters are hydrogen cyanamide (HC), mineral oil (MO) and Erger®. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HC, MO and Erger® following different chilling hour accumulation on bud break of 'Hosui' pear. 'Hosui' pear shoots were collected with 103 chill hours (CH) and conditioned in cold storage at 4±1°C for 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 days. For each date, shoots were cut as single bud cuttings, where the following treatments were applied in four replications of ten cuttings: control (water), HC 1%, MO 5%, Erger® 3% + calcium nitrate 3%, and HC 0.5% + OM 3%. After these, they were forced in a growth chamber until bud break, which was assessed every two days to estimate the bud break percentage and average bud break time. Bud break percentage showed no difference between treatments when submitted to 0 and 6 days (247 CH) of cold storage. After 12 days (391 CH), HC and HC + MO increase bud break percentage compared to the control. Those exposed to 18 days (535 CH) and treated with HC and HC + MO showed no significant difference in the bud break percentage compared to the control, whereas Erger® and MO significantly decreased the bud break percentage compared to other treatments. The average bud break time of HC treated cuttings was advanced the most and control delayed the most. When cuttings were subjected to low chilling hour accumulation, HC and HC + MO were more effective in bud break compared to Erger® and the control, while with higher chilling hour accumulation, the bud break promoters were dispensable. @ International Society for Horticultural Science. 653 $aDormancy 653 $aErger® 653 $aHydrogen cyanamide 653 $aMild winter conditions 653 $aMineral oil 653 $aPyrus pyrifolia Nakai 700 1 $aDINI, M. 700 1 $aCARRA, B. 700 1 $aMARCHI, P. M. 700 1 $aHERTER, F. G. 700 1 $aMELLO-FARIAS, P. C. 773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 299-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.42
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|